<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Dan's blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dberlin.org/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dberlin.org/blog</link>
	<description>Where innovation meets insanity</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Points-to analysis and the real world by Christophe</title>
		<link>http://www.dberlin.org/blog/2007/03/18/points-to-analysis-and-the-real-world/#comment-11997</link>
		<dc:creator>Christophe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 11:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dberlin.org/blog/2007/03/18/points-to-analysis-and-the-real-world/#comment-11997</guid>
		<description>Hi Dan,

It seems that you're really found of pointer analysis papers.
I really liked your position on current research works.
Since I'm starting research on this topic, it would be great if you could share your state-of-the-art bibliography on pointer analysis (for C, Java, etc.).
Many thanks in advance,

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dan,</p>
<p>It seems that you&#8217;re really found of pointer analysis papers.<br />
I really liked your position on current research works.<br />
Since I&#8217;m starting research on this topic, it would be great if you could share your state-of-the-art bibliography on pointer analysis (for C, Java, etc.).<br />
Many thanks in advance,</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Attention horrible Westchester drivers by commercial hotspots</title>
		<link>http://www.dberlin.org/blog/2005/08/21/attention-horrible-westchester-drivers/#comment-11993</link>
		<dc:creator>commercial hotspots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 07:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dberlin.org/blog/?p=6#comment-11993</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;commercial hotspots...&lt;/strong&gt;

commercial hotspots...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>commercial hotspots&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>commercial hotspots&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How copyrights and patents work, for engineers by Luis</title>
		<link>http://www.dberlin.org/blog/2007/06/20/how-copyrights-and-patents-work-for-engineers/#comment-11987</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dberlin.org/blog/2007/06/20/how-copyrights-and-patents-work-for-engineers/#comment-11987</guid>
		<description>I've considered giving a similar talk at a couple conferences; would love to get my hands on these slides as a starting point if/when they are done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve considered giving a similar talk at a couple conferences; would love to get my hands on these slides as a starting point if/when they are done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CVS2SVN and bitching about converted repository size by Daniel Jacobowitz</title>
		<link>http://www.dberlin.org/blog/2007/05/16/cvs2svn-and-bitching-about-converted-repository-size/#comment-11970</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Jacobowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 17:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dberlin.org/blog/2007/05/16/cvs2svn-and-bitching-about-converted-repository-size/#comment-11970</guid>
		<description>FYI: I fixed this problem last year and sent the cvs2svn developers a patch.  It's taking them a while, but they're still in the process of integrating it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI: I fixed this problem last year and sent the cvs2svn developers a patch.  It&#8217;s taking them a while, but they&#8217;re still in the process of integrating it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Points-to analysis and the real world by John "Z-Bo" Zabroski</title>
		<link>http://www.dberlin.org/blog/2007/03/18/points-to-analysis-and-the-real-world/#comment-11969</link>
		<dc:creator>John "Z-Bo" Zabroski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 21:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dberlin.org/blog/2007/03/18/points-to-analysis-and-the-real-world/#comment-11969</guid>
		<description>In a nutshell: ideally, &lt;b&gt;successful design anticipates all relevant and possible ways failure can occur&lt;/b&gt;.  Some people have a paranoidic approach to design, and they imagine that the &lt;i&gt;impossible could happen&lt;/i&gt;.  Failure in design is often non-quantitative, especially in software engineering, where accidental complexities are essentially non-numerical.

Has anyone ever published historical case studies on these design failures in optimizing compilers?  I wouldn't think so, because generally you implement an algorithm, it sucks, and you throw it away.  Although these sorts of failures are not as dramatic as the events at IBM that contributed to the "Software Crisis", there are probably some lessons that can be learned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a nutshell: ideally, <b>successful design anticipates all relevant and possible ways failure can occur</b>.  Some people have a paranoidic approach to design, and they imagine that the <i>impossible could happen</i>.  Failure in design is often non-quantitative, especially in software engineering, where accidental complexities are essentially non-numerical.</p>
<p>Has anyone ever published historical case studies on these design failures in optimizing compilers?  I wouldn&#8217;t think so, because generally you implement an algorithm, it sucks, and you throw it away.  Although these sorts of failures are not as dramatic as the events at IBM that contributed to the &#8220;Software Crisis&#8221;, there are probably some lessons that can be learned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Supreme court smacks down Federal Circuit, twice by Laurent GUERBY</title>
		<link>http://www.dberlin.org/blog/2007/04/30/supreme-court-smacks-down-federal-circuit-twice/#comment-11966</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurent GUERBY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 09:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dberlin.org/blog/2007/04/30/supreme-court-smacks-down-federal-circuit-twice/#comment-11966</guid>
		<description>Hi Daniel, here is a compiled link lists about the two IP decisions:

http://guerby.org/blog/index.php/2007/04/30/159-la-cour-supreme-des-usa-secoue-le-monde-du-brevet

For me obviousness comes from the "improve progress", there's no way you improve progress if every single thing unser the sun is patented :).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Daniel, here is a compiled link lists about the two IP decisions:</p>
<p><a href="http://guerby.org/blog/index.php/2007/04/30/159-la-cour-supreme-des-usa-secoue-le-monde-du-brevet" rel="nofollow">http://guerby.org/blog/index.php/2007/04/30/159-la-cour-supreme-des-usa-secoue-le-monde-du-brevet</a></p>
<p>For me obviousness comes from the &#8220;improve progress&#8221;, there&#8217;s no way you improve progress if every single thing unser the sun is patented :).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why prior art doesn&#8217;t matter - combining references by Steve Bragg</title>
		<link>http://www.dberlin.org/blog/2005/08/10/why-prior-art-doesnt-matter-combining-references/#comment-11964</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Bragg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dberlin.org/blog/?p=5#comment-11964</guid>
		<description>The Supreme Court &lt;a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#38;sid=aHigP6BkC8pE&#38;refer=home" rel="nofollow"&gt;just challenged&lt;/a&gt; the "teaching-suggestion-motivation" test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aHigP6BkC8pE&amp;refer=home" rel="nofollow">just challenged</a> the &#8220;teaching-suggestion-motivation&#8221; test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Warmer, healthy, productive by Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.dberlin.org/blog/2007/02/21/warmer-healthy-productive/#comment-4343</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dberlin.org/blog/2007/02/21/warmer-healthy-productive/#comment-4343</guid>
		<description>Fitter, healthier, more productive...
http://lyriki.com/index.php?title=Radiohead:Fitter_Happier

:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fitter, healthier, more productive&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://lyriki.com/index.php?title=Radiohead:Fitter_Happier" rel="nofollow">http://lyriki.com/index.php?title=Radiohead:Fitter_Happier</a></p>
<p> <img src='http://www.dberlin.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Optimizing the fsfs backend by Don Lapre James</title>
		<link>http://www.dberlin.org/blog/2006/06/26/optimizing-the-fsfs-backend/#comment-2648</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Lapre James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 23:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dberlin.org/blog/2006/06/26/optimizing-the-fsfs-backend/#comment-2648</guid>
		<description>I agree EdG.  Sounds like it would work better that way.

Jim	
Don Lapre James	
webmaster@linuxrocks.org	
www.linuxrocks.org  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree EdG.  Sounds like it would work better that way.</p>
<p>Jim<br />
Don Lapre James<br />
<a href="mailto:webmaster@linuxrocks.org">webmaster@linuxrocks.org</a><br />
<a href="http://www.linuxrocks.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.linuxrocks.org</a>  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Optimizing the fsfs backend by DannyB</title>
		<link>http://www.dberlin.org/blog/2006/06/26/optimizing-the-fsfs-backend/#comment-2429</link>
		<dc:creator>DannyB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 01:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dberlin.org/blog/2006/06/26/optimizing-the-fsfs-backend/#comment-2429</guid>
		<description>These discussions occur mainly on the dev list.
The reason no method exists for doing it yet is because nobody who wants to expend the development effort has had a need.  GCC's repository has &gt; 100k revisions, all in a single dir, with absolutely no noticeable performance effect (it is backed by ext3, which these days supports hashed directories).

Like most projects, the reality is there are a lot of people who simply sit there and believe that if they wish hard enough, the work will get done :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These discussions occur mainly on the dev list.<br />
The reason no method exists for doing it yet is because nobody who wants to expend the development effort has had a need.  GCC&#8217;s repository has > 100k revisions, all in a single dir, with absolutely no noticeable performance effect (it is backed by ext3, which these days supports hashed directories).</p>
<p>Like most projects, the reality is there are a lot of people who simply sit there and believe that if they wish hard enough, the work will get done <img src='http://www.dberlin.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
